7357 · AQA A Level
7357/31
(Pure & Statistics)
Mathematics · June 2022 · Variant 1
Relative difficulty
Analysis source: AQA
Analysis aligned to the official syllabus and assessment design.
4.0 / 5
300
360 min
Integration
Cohort performance
Session statistics from official examination reports
Total marks
300
Duration
360 min
Session difficulty
4.0 / 5
Key examiner messages
Top priorities from the principal examiner before you revise
A demanding full A-level: Paper 1 is entirely Pure, Paper 2 adds Mechanics and Paper 3 adds Statistics.
High-tariff synoptic questions (integration by substitution, trig proof, Newton–Raphson, differential-equation modelling) separate the grades.
Pure carries about two-thirds of the 300 marks.
Question difficulty map
How candidates performed on each question in this series
No data available in official reports
Assessment objectives
Skill and AO weighting from official examiner commentary
Skill weighting
Shows the skill mix this paper tested most heavily.
Algebraic fluency
Weight: 6100%Calculus
Weight: 583%Proof & Reasoning
Weight: 467%Mechanics
Weight: 350%Statistics Modelling & Interpretation
Weight: 233%
Method marks watchlist
Where working, steps, or method marks were commonly lost
Method marks
Asserting rather than proving each line in trigonometric-identity proofs — full justification is required for the method marks.
Recurring mistakes across years
Themes examiners flag in multiple recent sessions for this subject
No data available in official reports
Question choice intelligence
Mean scores and popularity for optional questions (HKDSE electives)
No data available in official reports
Level exemplars
What candidate scripts at each grade level looked like
No data available in official reports
Grade & admission context
How marks relate to grade thresholds and entry standards
Report type
Examiner report — national grade boundaries and question-level commentary
Level A*
Approx. 73% of maximum mark
Level A
Approx. 57% of maximum mark
Level B
Approx. 46% of maximum mark
Level C
Approx. 35% of maximum mark
Level D
Approx. 25% of maximum mark
Level E
Approx. 14% of maximum mark
Deep insights
What top candidates did
Techniques and approaches examiners rewarded in this series
No data available in official reports
Command word playbook
How to match each command word to the expected response style
Match the expected response style for “Find” questions.
Match the expected response style for “that” questions.
Match the expected response style for “Hence” questions.
Match the expected response style for “Prove” questions.
Give reasons and link mechanism to outcome; each point needs a because/so chain.
Match the expected response style for “Sketch” questions.
Match the expected response style for “State” questions.
Match the expected response style for “Deduce” questions.
Time traps
Sections where candidates spent disproportionate time relative to marks
Min per mark: 1.2
Min per mark: 1.2
Min per mark: 1.2
Min per mark: 1.2
Syllabus traceability
Topics linked to questions and mark weighting in this session
Integration
30 marks this session
Trigonometry
30 marks this session
Algebra and functions
28 marks this session
Differentiation
26 marks this session
MCQ trap analytics
Commonly chosen wrong options from examiner commentary
No data available in official reports
Topic heatmap across years
Mark concentration by topic and exam year for this subject
Mark intensity
Integration
Trigonometry
Differentiation
Algebra and functions
Difficulty trend
How session difficulty has shifted across recent years
Paper comparison
Marks and duration breakdown across papers in this session
Paper 1 (Pure):
Paper 2 (Pure & Mechanics):
Paper 3 (Pure & Statistics):
Marks you can still earn
Where valid approaches outside the mark scheme may still gain credit
No data available in official reports
Practise what examiners flagged
Target weak topics from this report inside the Revui app
Integration
30 marks this session
Practise in RevuiTrigonometry
30 marks this session
Practise in RevuiAlgebra and functions
28 marks this session
Practise in RevuiDifferentiation
26 marks this session
Practise in RevuiSelf-diagnostic checklist
Key actions before you sit this paper — copy and tick off as you revise
- 1Message
A demanding full A-level: Paper 1 is entirely Pure, Paper 2 adds Mechanics and Paper 3 adds Statistics.
- 2Message
High-tariff synoptic questions (integration by substitution, trig proof, Newton–Raphson, differential-equation modelling) separate the grades.
- 3Message
Pure carries about two-thirds of the 300 marks.
- 4Method
Asserting rather than proving each line in trigonometric-identity proofs — full justification is required for the method marks.
Teacher briefing pack
One-page session summary for tutors and classroom review
June 2022 2022
Mathematics
A demanding full A-level: Paper 1 is entirely Pure, Paper 2 adds Mechanics and Paper 3 adds Statistics. High-tariff synoptic questions (integration by substitution, trig proof, Newton–Raphson, differential-equation modelling) separate the grades. Pure carries about two-thirds of
A demanding full A-level: Paper 1 is entirely Pure, Paper 2 adds Mechanics and Paper 3 adds Statistics.
High-tariff synoptic questions (integration by substitution, trig proof, Newton–Raphson, differential-equation modelling) separate the grades.
Pure carries about two-thirds of the 300 marks.
- Total marks
- 300
- Duration
- 360 min
- Session difficulty
- 4.0 / 5
Session analysis
A demanding full A-level: Paper 1 is entirely Pure, Paper 2 adds Mechanics and Paper 3 adds Statistics. High-tariff synoptic questions (integration by substitution, trig proof, Newton–Raphson, differential-equation modelling) separate the grades. Pure carries about two-thirds of the 300 marks.
Updated Jun 17, 2026
Paper breakdown
Paper 1 (Pure):
Paper 2 (Pure & Mechanics):
Paper 3 (Pure & Statistics):
Top chapters
Exam structure insights
Marks by chapter
See where the marks were concentrated so revision time goes to the highest-value topics.
Mark accessibility
Estimate which marks were basic, mid-level, or high-difficulty.
70% within easy or medium reach
Command word frequency
Spot common command words so answers match the expected response style.
Question type mix
Compare the mark share of each paper section and question type.
Multi-step problem solving
115·16·38%
Short structured
70·18·23%
Proof / show that
66·12·22%
Modelling / interpretation
40·9·13%
Objective
(circle/tick)
9·9·3%
Study ROI
Bigger bubbles recur more often; higher bubbles carry more marks, helping you rank revision priorities.
Time vs marks
Compare marks with suggested time allocation to plan exam pacing.
Paper 1 (Pure)
0.83 m/minPaper 2 — Pure
0.83 m/minPaper 2 — Mechanics
0.83 m/minPaper 3 — Pure
0.83 m/minTotal marks
200
Total time
240 min
Avg pace
0.83
Next-year prediction
Topics worth watching next year, with the reason shown directly below each bar.
Integration by substitution
95%95%
Trigonometric proof / identities
90%90%
Newton–Raphson / numerical methods
85%85%
Normal-distribution hypothesis test
85%85%
Connected-particle mechanics
80%80%
Exam tips
Paper format
- Duration
- 2h
- Total marks
- 100
- Weighting
- 33.34%
- Question types
- Objective, Structured pure, Structured statistics
Analysis is paraphrased for study purposes. Always verify against the official examiner report and mark scheme.