9231 · Cambridge International AS Level
9231/22
Further Pure Mathematics 2
Mathematics - Further · June 2024 · Variant 2
Relative difficulty
Analysis source: Cambridge Assessment International Education
4.0 / 5
150
240 min
Calculus and Differential Equations
Cohort performance
Session statistics from official examination reports
Total marks
150
Duration
240 min
Session difficulty
4.0 / 5
Key examiner messages
Top priorities from the principal examiner before you revise
The May/June 2024 sitting for Further Mathematics (9231/12 and 9231/22) represents a high-caliber assessment, demanding an exceptional level of algebraic stamina, rigorous proof formulation, and geometric insight.
With a difficulty index of 4 out of 5, students had to navigate multi-layered questions where a single slip in the early stages could derail subsequent high-value marks.
Question difficulty map
How candidates performed on each question in this series
No data available in official reports
Assessment objectives
Skill and AO weighting from official examiner commentary
Skill weighting
Shows the skill mix this paper tested most heavily.
Algebraic Precision
Weight: 8100%Calculus
Weight: 675%Mechanics
Weight: 563%Proof & Reasoning
Weight: 450%Rigour
Weight: 338%Spatial /
Weight: 225%Diagram
Weight: 113%
Method marks watchlist
Where working, steps, or method marks were commonly lost
No data available in official reports
Recurring mistakes across years
Themes examiners flag in multiple recent sessions for this subject
No data available in official reports
Question choice intelligence
Mean scores and popularity for optional questions (HKDSE electives)
No data available in official reports
Level exemplars
What candidate scripts at each grade level looked like
No data available in official reports
Grade & admission context
How marks relate to grade thresholds and entry standards
Report type
Cambridge Principal Examiner Report — component performance and international standards
Level A
Approx. 79% of maximum mark
Level B
Approx. 60% of maximum mark
Level C
Approx. 52% of maximum mark
Level D
Approx. 43% of maximum mark
Level E
Approx. 34% of maximum mark
Deep insights
What top candidates did
Techniques and approaches examiners rewarded in this series
No data available in official reports
Command word playbook
How to match each command word to the expected response style
Match the expected response style for “Find” questions.
Match the expected response style for “Show” questions.
Match the expected response style for “Prove” questions.
Match the expected response style for “Sketch” questions.
Match the expected response style for “Verify” questions.
Match the expected response style for “Deduce” questions.
Time traps
Sections where candidates spent disproportionate time relative to marks
Min per mark: 2
Min per mark: 1.7
Min per mark: 1.6
Min per mark: 1.6
Min per mark: 1.6
Min per mark: 1.6
Syllabus traceability
Topics linked to questions and mark weighting in this session
Integration
21 marks this session
Differential equations
20 marks this session
Matrices (Further Pure 2)
16 marks this session
MCQ trap analytics
Commonly chosen wrong options from examiner commentary
No data available in official reports
Topic heatmap across years
Mark concentration by topic and exam year for this subject
Mark intensity
Differential equations (Further Pure Mathematics 2)
Integration (Further Pure Mathematics 2)
Matrices (Further Pure Mathematics 2)
Differential equations
Integration
Vectors
Rational functions and graphs
Hyperbolic functions
Paper comparison
Marks and duration breakdown across papers in this session
Paper 1 Further Pure Mathematics 1 (9231/12):
Paper 2 Further Pure Mathematics 2 (9231/22):
Marks you can still earn
Where valid approaches outside the mark scheme may still gain credit
No data available in official reports
Practise what examiners flagged
Target weak topics from this report inside the Revui app
Integration
21 marks this session
Practise in RevuiDifferential equations
20 marks this session
Practise in RevuiMatrices (Further Pure 2)
16 marks this session
Practise in RevuiSelf-diagnostic checklist
Key actions before you sit this paper — copy and tick off as you revise
- 1Message
The May/June 2024 sitting for Further Mathematics (9231/12 and 9231/22) represents a high-caliber assessment, demanding an exceptional level of algebraic stamina, rigorous proof formulation, and geometric insight.
- 2Message
With a difficulty index of 4 out of 5, students had to navigate multi-layered questions where a single slip in the early stages could derail subsequent high-value marks.
Teacher briefing pack
One-page session summary for tutors and classroom review
June 2024 2024
Mathematics - Further
The May/June 2024 sitting for Further Mathematics (9231/12 and 9231/22) represents a high-caliber assessment, demanding an exceptional level of algebraic stamina, rigorous proof formulation, and geometric insight. With a difficulty index of 4 out of 5, students had to navigate mu
The May/June 2024 sitting for Further Mathematics (9231/12 and 9231/22) represents a high-caliber assessment, demanding an exceptional level of algebraic stamina, rigorous proof formulation, and geometric insight.
With a difficulty index of 4 out of 5, students had to navigate multi-layered questions where a single slip in the early stages could derail subsequent high-value marks.
- Total marks
- 150
- Duration
- 240 min
- Session difficulty
- 4.0 / 5
Session analysis
The May/June 2024 sitting for Further Mathematics (9231/12 and 9231/22) represents a high-caliber assessment, demanding an exceptional level of algebraic stamina, rigorous proof formulation, and geometric insight. With a difficulty index of 4 out of 5, students had to navigate multi-layered questions where a single slip in the early stages could derail subsequent high-value marks.
Updated Jun 12, 2026
Paper breakdown
Paper 1 Further Pure Mathematics 1 (9231/12):
Paper 2 Further Pure Mathematics 2 (9231/22):
Top chapters
Exam structure insights
Marks by chapter
See where the marks were concentrated so revision time goes to the highest-value topics.
Mark accessibility
Estimate which marks were basic, mid-level, or high-difficulty.
75% within easy or medium reach
Command word frequency
Spot common command words so answers match the expected response style.
Question type mix
Compare the mark share of each paper section and question type.
Calculus / Integration Steps
44·4·29%
Algebraic Calculation
36·5·24%
Graph / Curve Sketching
36·2·24%
Structured Proof / Induction
34·4·23%
Study ROI
Bigger bubbles recur more often; higher bubbles carry more marks, helping you rank revision priorities.
Difficulty trend
Compare difficulty across recent years.
Time vs marks
Compare marks with suggested time allocation to plan exam pacing.
P1 Q1-3 (Pure Algeb
0.50 m/minP1 Q4-5 (Matrices &
0.63 m/minP1 Q6-7 (Rational &
0.63 m/minP2 Q1-3 (Complex &
0.64 m/minP2 Q4-5 (Riemann In
0.63 m/minP2 Q6-7 (Differenti
0.60 m/minP2 Q8 (Matrices)
0.64 m/minTotal marks
140
Total time
228 min
Avg pace
0.61
Next-year prediction
Topics worth watching next year, with the reason shown directly below each bar.
Polar Coordinate Arc Lengths
85%85%
3D Lines and Planes Intersection
78%78%
Difficulty Verdict
The May/June 2024 sitting for Further Mathematics (9231/12 and 9231/22) represents a high-caliber assessment, demanding an exceptional level of algebraic stamina, rigorous proof formulation, and geometric insight. With a difficulty index of 4 out of 5, students had to navigate multi-layered questions where a single slip in the early stages could derail subsequent high-value marks.
Exam tips
Paper format
- Duration
- 2h
- Total marks
- 75
- Weighting
- 50%
- Question types
- Structured Questions
Analysis is paraphrased for study purposes. Always verify against the official examiner report and mark scheme.