Back to subject papers

CHINESE-LANGUAGE · HKDSE

CHINESE-LANGUAGE/21

Writing

Chinese Language · 2021 · Variant 1

Relative difficulty

Demanding · 3.5/5

Analysis source: Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority (HKEAA)

Analysis aligned to the official syllabus and assessment design.

Relative difficulty

3.5 / 5

Total marks

146

Duration

210 min

Most tested topic

Integrated Writing and Applied Text Comprehension

Cohort performance

Session statistics from official examination reports

Total marks

146

Duration

210 min

Session difficulty

3.5 / 5

Level 5**

~72% of max

Level 5*

~68% of max

Level 5

~65% of max

Key examiner messages

Top priorities from the principal examiner before you revise

1

The 2021 HKDSE Chinese Language examination features structured assessments across reading and integrated skills.

2

Paper 1 Part A tests set texts including 'Fish I Want', 'Carefree Journey', 'On Benevolence/Filial Piety/Gentleman', and 'Niannuojiao'.

3

Part B presents modern fiction by Ryunosuke Akutagawa and modern prose by Hsu Kuo-neng, contrasting themes of orange warmth and mundane struggles, followed by a classical text from Shuo Yuan evaluating Shen Ming's conflict between loyalty and filial piety.

4

Paper 3 assesses listening comprehension on online gaming and a formal speech about life orientations and community experience selection.

Question difficulty map

How candidates performed on each question in this series

No data available in official reports

Assessment objectives

Skill and AO weighting from official examiner commentary

Memoriza7
Textual Interpretation6
Critical Evaluation4
Contextual Practical2

Skill weighting

Shows the skill mix this paper tested most heavily.

MemorizaMemorizaTextual InterpretationTextualInterpretationCritical EvaluationCriticalEvaluationContextual PracticalContextualPractical
SkillWeightShare
  • Memoriza

    Weight: 7100%
  • Textual Interpretation

    Weight: 686%
  • Critical Evaluation

    Weight: 457%
  • Contextual Practical

    Weight: 229%

Method marks watchlist

Where working, steps, or method marks were commonly lost

No data available in official reports

Recurring mistakes across years

Themes examiners flag in multiple recent sessions for this subject

No data available in official reports

Question choice intelligence

Mean scores and popularity for optional questions (HKDSE electives)

No data available in official reports

Level exemplars

What candidate scripts at each grade level looked like

No data available in official reports

Grade & admission context

How marks relate to grade thresholds and entry standards

Reporting source

HKEAA Subject Examination Report — comments on candidates’ performance with marking schemes

Level 5**

Outstanding — competitive JUPAS programmes (medicine, law, top faculties)

Level 5*

Excellent — strong JUPAS profile for selective programmes

Level 5

Good — meets most university entrance requirements

Level 4

Satisfactory — foundation programmes or less selective routes

Level 3

Pass threshold for many sub-degree and vocational pathways

Admission context

Levels feed JUPAS and non-JUPAS university applications; 5** and 5* are most selective

Deep insights

What top candidates did

Techniques and approaches examiners rewarded in this series

No data available in official reports

Command word playbook

How to match each command word to the expected response style

ExplainFrequency: 14

Give reasons and link mechanism to outcome; each point needs a because/so chain.

SummarizeFrequency: 6

Match the expected response style for “Summarize” questions.

JudgeFrequency: 4

Match the expected response style for “Judge” questions.

IdentifyFrequency: 3

Name or point to the specific feature asked for — avoid extra explanation.

JustifyFrequency: 4

Support your choice with specific evidence from data or the scenario given.

Time traps

Sections where candidates spent disproportionate time relative to marks

P3 Part A (Listenin40m / 20 marks

Min per mark: 2

P1 Part B2 (Classic30m / 18 marks

Min per mark: 1.7

P1 Part A (Set Text25m / 24 marks

Min per mark: 1

P1 Part B1 (Modern35m / 34 marks

Min per mark: 1

Syllabus traceability

Topics linked to questions and mark weighting in this session

Speech on Applied Life Orientations

50 marks this session

Carefree Journey

14 marks this session

Comparative Modern Fiction and Prose

34 marks this session

MCQ trap analytics

Commonly chosen wrong options from examiner commentary

No data available in official reports

Topic heatmap across years

Mark concentration by topic and exam year for this subject

Mark intensity

LowHigh
Topic
2021
2022
2023
2025
Σ

Paper 2 - Writing Capacity (Extended Essays)

100
100

Paper 3 - Listening and Integrated Tasks

100
100

Speech on Applied Life Orientations

50
50

Unseen Modern Prose (Zhou Guoping)

38
38

Comparative Modern Fiction and Prose

34
34

Carefree Journey

14
14

Biographies of Lian Po and Lin Xiangru (Excerpt)

10
10

Prescribed Text: Analects (论语)

7
7

Difficulty trend

How session difficulty has shifted across recent years

2021202220232025
2021 2021 · 3.5/52022 2022 · 3.8/52023 2023 · 4.0/52025 2025 · 3.8/5

Paper comparison

Marks and duration breakdown across papers in this session

試卷一 閱讀能力: 試卷三 聆聽及綜合能力考核:

76 marks90 min

Marks you can still earn

Where valid approaches outside the mark scheme may still gain credit

No data available in official reports

Practise what examiners flagged

Target weak topics from this report inside the Revui app

Self-diagnostic checklist

Key actions before you sit this paper — copy and tick off as you revise

  • 1Message

    The 2021 HKDSE Chinese Language examination features structured assessments across reading and integrated skills.

  • 2Message

    Paper 1 Part A tests set texts including 'Fish I Want', 'Carefree Journey', 'On Benevolence/Filial Piety/Gentleman', and 'Niannuojiao'.

  • 3Message

    Part B presents modern fiction by Ryunosuke Akutagawa and modern prose by Hsu Kuo-neng, contrasting themes of orange warmth and mundane struggles, followed by a classical text from Shuo Yuan evaluating Shen Ming's conflict between loyalty and filial piety.

  • 4Message

    Paper 3 assesses listening comprehension on online gaming and a formal speech about life orientations and community experience selection.

Teacher briefing pack

One-page session summary for tutors and classroom review

2021 2021

Chinese Language

The 2021 HKDSE Chinese Language examination features structured assessments across reading and integrated skills. Paper 1 Part A tests set texts including 'Fish I Want', 'Carefree Journey', 'On Benevolence/Filial Piety/Gentleman', and 'Niannuojiao'. Part B presents modern fiction

  • The 2021 HKDSE Chinese Language examination features structured assessments across reading and integrated skills.

  • Paper 1 Part A tests set texts including 'Fish I Want', 'Carefree Journey', 'On Benevolence/Filial Piety/Gentleman', and 'Niannuojiao'.

  • Part B presents modern fiction by Ryunosuke Akutagawa and modern prose by Hsu Kuo-neng, contrasting themes of orange warmth and mundane struggles, followed by a classical text from Shuo Yuan evaluating Shen Ming's conflict between loyalty and filial piety.

Total marks
146
Duration
210 min
Session difficulty
3.5 / 5
Level 5**
~72% of max
Level 5*
~68% of max
Level 5
~65% of max

Session analysis

The 2021 HKDSE Chinese Language examination features structured assessments across reading and integrated skills. Paper 1 Part A tests set texts including 'Fish I Want', 'Carefree Journey', 'On Benevolence/Filial Piety/Gentleman', and 'Niannuojiao'. Part B presents modern fiction by Ryunosuke Akutagawa and modern prose by Hsu Kuo-neng, contrasting themes of orange warmth and mundane struggles, followed by a classical text from Shuo Yuan evaluating Shen Ming's conflict between loyalty and filial piety. Paper 3 assesses listening comprehension on online gaming and a formal speech about life orientations and community experience selection.

Updated Jun 11, 2026

Paper breakdown

試卷一 閱讀能力: 試卷三 聆聽及綜合能力考核:

76 marks90 min

Top chapters

Speech on Applied Life Orientations50 marks
Carefree Journey14 marks
Comparative Modern Fiction and Prose34 marks

Exam structure insights

Marks by chapter

See where the marks were concentrated so revision time goes to the highest-value topics.

Carefree Journey (Zhuangzi)14 marks
Fish I Want (Mencius)2 marks
Confucian Sayings on Benevolenc2 marks
Three Songs of Song Lyric - Nia6 marks
Comparative Modern Prose & Fict34 marks
Unseen Classical Prose (Shuo Yu18 marks
Listening Comprehension Task20 marks
Integrated Speech Design Task50 marks

Mark accessibility

Estimate which marks were basic, mid-level, or high-difficulty.

72% within easy or medium reach

40
65
41
Easy: 40 marksMedium: 65 marksHard: 41 marks

Command word frequency

Spot common command words so answers match the expected response style.

Explain14 times
Summarize6 times
Judge4 times
Identify3 times
Justify4 times

Question type mix

Compare the mark share of each paper section and question type.

146Marks
  • Integrated Writing / Performance Task

    50·1·34%

  • Extended Response / Evaluation

    40·8·27%

  • Multiple Choice

    29·24·20%

  • Short Answer / Table Completion

    27·15·18%

Study ROI

Bigger bubbles recur more often; higher bubbles carry more marks, helping you rank revision priorities.

DifficultyRecurrence %Carefree JourneyConfucian AnalectsSong Lyric - Niann…Fish I Want

Time vs marks

Compare marks with suggested time allocation to plan exam pacing.

MarksMinutesMarks / min

P1 Part A (Set Text

0.96 m/min
24
25

P1 Part B1 (Modern

0.97 m/min
34
35

P1 Part B2 (Classic

0.60 m/min
18
30

P3 Part A (Listenin

0.50 m/min
20
40

Total marks

96

Total time

130 min

Avg pace

0.74

Next-year prediction

Topics worth watching next year, with the reason shown directly below each bar.

Memorial on Sending Out the Troops

90%

90%

First Visit to West Mountain

85%

85%

On Six States

75%

75%

Exam tips

Paper format

Duration
2h 15min
Total marks
153
Weighting
45%
Question types
Practical Writing (實用寫作), Creative/Argumentative Essay (命題寫作)

Analysis is paraphrased for study purposes. Always verify against the official examiner report and mark scheme.

CHINESE-LANGUAGE/21 — HKDSE Chinese Language (2021) | Revui