PHYSICS · IB Diploma Programme
PHYSICS/11
A (Multiple Choice)
Physics · 2024 · Variant 1
Relative difficulty
Analysis source: International Baccalaureate Organization
Analysis aligned to the official syllabus and assessment design.
3.5 / 5
115
180 min
Astrophysics (Option D)
Cohort performance
Session statistics from official examination reports
Total marks
115
Duration
180 min
Session difficulty
3.5 / 5
Key examiner messages
Top priorities from the principal examiner before you revise
The May 2024 standard level Physics papers presented a balanced yet rigorous assessment.
Standard Level candidates faced a mixture of highly accessible computational marks alongside challenging conceptual justifications that demanded a deeper understanding of physical models.
Overall, the exam is rated as a moderate-to-hard 3.5-star difficulty.
Compare difficulty across recent years. Compare topic weight by year to spot recurring and returning areas.
Question difficulty map
How candidates performed on each question in this series
No data available in official reports
Assessment objectives
Skill and AO weighting from official examiner commentary
Skill weighting
Shows the skill mix this paper tested most heavily.
Mathematical
Weight: 6100%Graphical Interpretation
Weight: 583%Conceptual Reasoning
Weight: 350%Experimental
Weight: 117%
Method marks watchlist
Where working, steps, or method marks were commonly lost
No data available in official reports
Recurring mistakes across years
Themes examiners flag in multiple recent sessions for this subject
No data available in official reports
Question choice intelligence
Mean scores and popularity for optional questions (HKDSE electives)
No data available in official reports
Level exemplars
What candidate scripts at each grade level looked like
No data available in official reports
Grade & admission context
How marks relate to grade thresholds and entry standards
Report type
IB subject report — grade distributions, IA weighting, and HL/SL distinctions
Level 7
Excellent — top band for competitive university offers
Level 6
Very good — strong HL performance
Level 5
Good — solid pass at higher level
Level 4
Satisfactory — minimum for many university credits
Level 3
Mediocre
Level 2
Poor
Level 1
Very poor
Deep insights
What top candidates did
Techniques and approaches examiners rewarded in this series
No data available in official reports
Command word playbook
How to match each command word to the expected response style
Show formula, substitution, and unit; method marks need visible working.
Give reasons and link mechanism to outcome; each point needs a because/so chain.
Match the expected response style for “Determine” questions.
Match the expected response style for “that” questions.
Apply knowledge to an unfamiliar context; concise, practical points score best.
Match the expected response style for “Outline” questions.
Time traps
Sections where candidates spent disproportionate time relative to marks
Min per mark: 1.8
Min per mark: 1.7
Min per mark: 1.5
Min per mark: 1.5
Syllabus traceability
Topics linked to questions and mark weighting in this session
Astrophysics (Option D)
20 marks this session
Measurements and Uncertainties
17 marks this session
Current and circuits
12 marks this session
Wave phenomena
10 marks this session
Gas laws
8 marks this session
MCQ trap analytics
Commonly chosen wrong options from examiner commentary
No data available in official reports
Topic heatmap across years
Mark concentration by topic and exam year for this subject
Mark intensity
Measurements and Uncertainties
Current and circuits
Astrophysics (Option D)
Option D: Astrophysics
Electric and magnetic fields
Forces and momentum
Greenhouse effect (The particulate nature of matter)
Wave phenomena
Paper comparison
Marks and duration breakdown across papers in this session
Paper 1 (Standard Level):
Paper 2 (Standard Level):
Paper 3 (Standard Level):
Marks you can still earn
Where valid approaches outside the mark scheme may still gain credit
No data available in official reports
Practise what examiners flagged
Target weak topics from this report inside the Revui app
Astrophysics (Option D)
20 marks this session
Practise in RevuiMeasurements and Uncertainties
17 marks this session
Practise in RevuiCurrent and circuits
12 marks this session
Practise in RevuiWave phenomena
10 marks this session
Practise in RevuiGas laws
8 marks this session
Practise in RevuiSelf-diagnostic checklist
Key actions before you sit this paper — copy and tick off as you revise
- 1Message
The May 2024 standard level Physics papers presented a balanced yet rigorous assessment.
- 2Message
Standard Level candidates faced a mixture of highly accessible computational marks alongside challenging conceptual justifications that demanded a deeper understanding of physical models.
- 3Message
Overall, the exam is rated as a moderate-to-hard 3.5-star difficulty.
- 4Message
Compare difficulty across recent years. Compare topic weight by year to spot recurring and returning areas.
Teacher briefing pack
One-page session summary for tutors and classroom review
2024 2024
Physics
The May 2024 standard level Physics papers presented a balanced yet rigorous assessment. Standard Level candidates faced a mixture of highly accessible computational marks alongside challenging conceptual justifications that demanded a deeper understanding of physical models. Ove
The May 2024 standard level Physics papers presented a balanced yet rigorous assessment.
Standard Level candidates faced a mixture of highly accessible computational marks alongside challenging conceptual justifications that demanded a deeper understanding of physical models.
Overall, the exam is rated as a moderate-to-hard 3.5-star difficulty.
- Total marks
- 115
- Duration
- 180 min
- Session difficulty
- 3.5 / 5
Session analysis
The May 2024 standard level Physics papers presented a balanced yet rigorous assessment. Standard Level candidates faced a mixture of highly accessible computational marks alongside challenging conceptual justifications that demanded a deeper understanding of physical models. Overall, the exam is rated as a moderate-to-hard 3.5-star difficulty.
Updated Jun 14, 2026
Paper breakdown
Paper 1 (Standard Level):
Paper 2 (Standard Level):
Paper 3 (Standard Level):
Top chapters
Exam structure insights
Marks by chapter
See where the marks were concentrated so revision time goes to the highest-value topics.
Mark accessibility
Estimate which marks were basic, mid-level, or high-difficulty.
78% within easy or medium reach
Command word frequency
Spot common command words so answers match the expected response style.
Question type mix
Compare the mark share of each paper section and question type.
Short Answer / Structured
85·18·74%
Multiple Choice
30·30·26%
Study ROI
Bigger bubbles recur more often; higher bubbles carry more marks, helping you rank revision priorities.
Difficulty trend
Compare difficulty across recent years.
Time vs marks
Compare marks with suggested time allocation to plan exam pacing.
Paper 1
0.67 m/minPaper 2
0.67 m/minPaper 3 Section A
0.60 m/minPaper 3 Section B (
0.57 m/minTotal marks
115
Total time
180 min
Avg pace
0.64
Next-year prediction
Topics worth watching next year, with the reason shown directly below each bar.
Motion in electromagnetic fields
85%85%
Simple harmonic motion
75%75%
May 2024 IB Physics SL Exam Analysis
The May 2024 standard level Physics papers presented a balanced yet rigorous assessment. Standard Level candidates faced a mixture of highly accessible computational marks alongside challenging conceptual justifications that demanded a deeper understanding of physical models. Overall, the exam is rated as a moderate-to-hard 3.5-star difficulty.
Exam tips
Paper format
- Duration
- 1h 20min
- Total marks
- 40
- Question types
- Multiple Choice
Analysis is paraphrased for study purposes. Always verify against the official examiner report and mark scheme.