Back to subject papers

GATEWAY-SCIENCE-CHEMISTRY-A-J248 · Cambridge OCR GCSE (9–1)

GATEWAY-SCIENCE-CHEMISTRY-A-J248/31

(Higher Tier) - Topics C1-C3 and C7

Gateway Science Chemistry A · June 2022 · Variant 1

Relative difficulty

Demanding · 3.5/5

Analysis source: OCR

Analysis aligned to the official syllabus and assessment design.

Relative difficulty

3.5 / 5

Total marks

180

Duration

210 min

Most tested topic

Quantitative Stoichiometry and Calculation of Concentrations/Yields

Cohort performance

Session statistics from official examination reports

Total marks

180

Duration

210 min

Session difficulty

3.5 / 5

Key examiner messages

Top priorities from the principal examiner before you revise

1

The June 2022 J248 examination series for the OCR Gateway GCSE (9-1) Chemistry A specification presented a balanced yet highly demanding set of papers across both tiers.

2

The Higher Tier (Papers 3 & 4) maintained a strong emphasis on mathematical competency, qualitative analysis, and practical experimental design, placing it at a solid 3.5 out of 5 on our difficulty index.

3

In contrast, the Foundation Tier offered more guided, step-by-step pathways but still penalized candidates who glossed over critical vocabulary or failed to master fundamental stoichiometric calculations.

Question difficulty map

How candidates performed on each question in this series

No data available in official reports

Assessment objectives

Skill and AO weighting from official examiner commentary

Mathematical & Calculation7
Recall & Understanding6
Scientific5
Practical & Experimental4
Analysis & Evaluation2
Evaluation1

Skill weighting

Shows the skill mix this paper tested most heavily.

Mathematical & CalculationMathematical &CalculationRecall & UnderstandingRecall &UnderstandingScientificScientificPractical & ExperimentalPractical &ExperimentalAnalysis & EvaluationAnalysis &EvaluationEvaluationEvaluation
SkillWeightShare
  • Mathematical & Calculation

    Weight: 7100%
  • Recall & Understanding

    Weight: 686%
  • Scientific

    Weight: 571%
  • Practical & Experimental

    Weight: 457%
  • Analysis & Evaluation

    Weight: 229%
  • Evaluation

    Weight: 114%

Method marks watchlist

Where working, steps, or method marks were commonly lost

Method marks

Not showing clear working out steps in multi-mark stoichiometry questions, resulting in loss of all method marks if the final value is incorrect.

Recurring mistakes across years

Themes examiners flag in multiple recent sessions for this subject

No data available in official reports

Question choice intelligence

Mean scores and popularity for optional questions (HKDSE electives)

No data available in official reports

Level exemplars

What candidate scripts at each grade level looked like

No data available in official reports

Grade & admission context

How marks relate to grade thresholds and entry standards

Report type

Examiner report — national grade boundaries and question-level commentary

Level 9

Approx. 79% of maximum mark

Level 8

Approx. 68% of maximum mark

Level 7

Approx. 57% of maximum mark

Level 6

Approx. 46% of maximum mark

Level 5

Approx. 35% of maximum mark

Level 4

Approx. 24% of maximum mark

Level 3

Approx. 18% of maximum mark

Deep insights

What top candidates did

Techniques and approaches examiners rewarded in this series

No data available in official reports

Command word playbook

How to match each command word to the expected response style

CalculateFrequency: 12

Show formula, substitution, and unit; method marks need visible working.

ExplainFrequency: 22

Give reasons and link mechanism to outcome; each point needs a because/so chain.

DescribeFrequency: 14

State features in sequence or list observable properties — do not explain causes unless asked.

StateFrequency: 15

Match the expected response style for “State” questions.

SuggestFrequency: 8

Apply knowledge to an unfamiliar context; concise, practical points score best.

CompleteFrequency: 6

Match the expected response style for “Complete” questions.

IdentifyFrequency: 4

Name or point to the specific feature asked for — avoid extra explanation.

Time traps

Sections where candidates spent disproportionate time relative to marks

Section B (Level of15m / 12 marks

Min per mark: 1.3

Section B (Quantita45m / 38 marks

Min per mark: 1.2

Section A (Multiple30m / 30 marks

Min per mark: 1

Syllabus traceability

Topics linked to questions and mark weighting in this session

Introducing chemical reactions

40 marks this session

Improving processes and products

17 marks this session

Bonding

16 marks this session

MCQ trap analytics

Commonly chosen wrong options from examiner commentary

No data available in official reports

Topic heatmap across years

Mark concentration by topic and exam year for this subject

Mark intensity

LowHigh
Topic
2022
2023
2024
Σ

Introducing chemical reactions

40
25
18
83

Organic chemistry

32
25
57

Bonding

16
20
36

Predicting chemical reactions

22
22

Improving processes and products

17
17

Purity and separating mixtures

12
12

Difficulty trend

How session difficulty has shifted across recent years

202220232024
2022 June 2022 · 3.5/52023 June 2023 · 3.5/52024 June 2024 · 3.0/5

Paper comparison

Marks and duration breakdown across papers in this session

Paper 3 (Higher Tier):

90 marks105 min

Paper 4 (Higher Tier):

90 marks105 min

Marks you can still earn

Where valid approaches outside the mark scheme may still gain credit

  • Not showing clear working out steps in multi-mark stoichiometry questions, resulting in loss of all method marks if the final value is incorrect.

Practise what examiners flagged

Target weak topics from this report inside the Revui app

Self-diagnostic checklist

Key actions before you sit this paper — copy and tick off as you revise

  • 1Message

    The June 2022 J248 examination series for the OCR Gateway GCSE (9-1) Chemistry A specification presented a balanced yet highly demanding set of papers across both tiers.

  • 2Message

    The Higher Tier (Papers 3 & 4) maintained a strong emphasis on mathematical competency, qualitative analysis, and practical experimental design, placing it at a solid 3.5 out of 5 on our difficulty index.

  • 3Message

    In contrast, the Foundation Tier offered more guided, step-by-step pathways but still penalized candidates who glossed over critical vocabulary or failed to master fundamental stoichiometric calculations.

  • 4Method

    Not showing clear working out steps in multi-mark stoichiometry questions, resulting in loss of all method marks if the final value is incorrect.

Teacher briefing pack

One-page session summary for tutors and classroom review

June 2022 2022

Gateway Science Chemistry A

The June 2022 J248 examination series for the OCR Gateway GCSE (9-1) Chemistry A specification presented a balanced yet highly demanding set of papers across both tiers. The Higher Tier (Papers 3 & 4) maintained a strong emphasis on mathematical competency, qualitative analysis,

  • The June 2022 J248 examination series for the OCR Gateway GCSE (9-1) Chemistry A specification presented a balanced yet highly demanding set of papers across both tiers.

  • The Higher Tier (Papers 3 & 4) maintained a strong emphasis on mathematical competency, qualitative analysis, and practical experimental design, placing it at a solid 3.5 out of 5 on our difficulty index.

  • In contrast, the Foundation Tier offered more guided, step-by-step pathways but still penalized candidates who glossed over critical vocabulary or failed to master fundamental stoichiometric calculations.

Total marks
180
Duration
210 min
Session difficulty
3.5 / 5

Session analysis

The June 2022 J248 examination series for the OCR Gateway GCSE (9-1) Chemistry A specification presented a balanced yet highly demanding set of papers across both tiers. The Higher Tier (Papers 3 & 4) maintained a strong emphasis on mathematical competency, qualitative analysis, and practical experimental design, placing it at a solid 3.5 out of 5 on our difficulty index. In contrast, the Foundation Tier offered more guided, step-by-step pathways but still penalized candidates who glossed over critical vocabulary or failed to master fundamental stoichiometric calculations.

Updated Jun 14, 2026

Paper breakdown

Paper 3 (Higher Tier):

90 marks105 min

Paper 4 (Higher Tier):

90 marks105 min

Top chapters

Introducing chemical reactions40 marks
Improving processes and products17 marks
Bonding16 marks

Exam structure insights

Marks by chapter

See where the marks were concentrated so revision time goes to the highest-value topics.

Properties of materials10 marks
Equilibria5 marks
Types of chemical reactions9 marks
The particle model5 marks
Electrolysis11 marks
Purity and separating mixtures12 marks
Atomic structure5 marks
Monitoring chemical reactions4 marks

Mark accessibility

Estimate which marks were basic, mid-level, or high-difficulty.

72% within easy or medium reach

50
80
50
Easy: 50 marksMedium: 80 marksHard: 50 marks

Command word frequency

Spot common command words so answers match the expected response style.

Calculate12 times
Explain22 times
Describe14 times
State15 times
Suggest8 times
Complete6 times
Identify4 times

Question type mix

Compare the mark share of each paper section and question type.

180Marks
  • short_answer

    74·40·41%

  • structured_calculation

    64·16·36%

  • multiple_choice

    30·30·17%

  • extended_response

    12·2·7%

Study ROI

Bigger bubbles recur more often; higher bubbles carry more marks, helping you rank revision priorities.

DifficultyRecurrence %Bonding and Struct…Rates of ReactionSeparation Techniq…Fertilisers, Alloy…Stoichiometry and …

Time vs marks

Compare marks with suggested time allocation to plan exam pacing.

MarksMinutesMarks / min

Section A (Multiple

1.00 m/min
30
30

Section B (Quantita

0.84 m/min
38
45

Section B (Level of

0.80 m/min
12
15

Total marks

80

Total time

90 min

Avg pace

0.89

Cumulative marks ladder

The line is your running mark total question by question; dashed lines are the estimated grade cut-offs. See which question the line crosses your target grade at, so you know how far you must answer cleanly and which questions decide a band.

045901351809 estimated8 estimated7 estimated6 estimated5 estimated4 estimated3 estimatedU estimated20406080100120140160175180

Next-year prediction

Topics worth watching next year, with the reason shown directly below each bar.

Electrolysis of Molten vs Aqueous Salts

90%

90%

Transition Metal Properties and Trends

88%

88%

Haber Process and Reversible Reactions Economics

85%

85%

J248 Chemistry June 2022 Exam Series: Deep-Dive Analysis

The June 2022 J248 examination series for the OCR Gateway GCSE (9-1) Chemistry A specification presented a balanced yet highly demanding set of papers across both tiers. The Higher Tier (Papers 3 & 4) maintained a strong emphasis on mathematical competency, qualitative analysis, and practical experimental design, placing it at a solid 3.5 out of 5 on our difficulty index. In contrast, the Foundation Tier offered more guided, step-by-step pathways but still penalized candidates who glossed over critical vocabulary or failed to master fundamental stoichiometric calculations.

Exam tips

Paper format

Duration
1h 45min
Total marks
90
Weighting
50%
Question types
Multiple Choice, Structured / Mathematical Calculation, Structured / Descriptive Short-Answer, Extended Response (* - Level of Response)

Analysis is paraphrased for study purposes. Always verify against the official examiner report and mark scheme.

GATEWAY-SCIENCE-CHEMISTRY-A-J248/31 — Cambridge OCR GCSE (9–1) Gateway Science Chemistry A (June 2022) | Revui