GEOGRAPHY-9GE0 · Pearson Edexcel A Level
GEOGRAPHY-9GE0/31
Synoptic Investigation
Geography · 2022 · Variant 1
Relative difficulty
Analysis source: Pearson Edexcel
Analysis aligned to the official syllabus and assessment design.
4.0 / 5
280
405 min
Climate change vulnerability, environmental hazards, and sustainable development of Small Island Developing States (SIDS)
Cohort performance
Session statistics from official examination reports
Total marks
280
Duration
405 min
Session difficulty
4.0 / 5
Key examiner messages
Top priorities from the principal examiner before you revise
High-scoring candidates distinguished themselves by demonstrating conceptual precision and robust mathematical processing.
In Paper 1, the physical processes behind landscape evolution (such as halosere succession in coastal spits or thermohaline circulation in ocean carbon regulation) required strict geographical terminology rather than general descriptions.
In Paper 2, top-tier marks were awarded to those who did not merely describe regeneration or migration but evaluated the success of strategies through well-defined criteria (e.g., economic productivity versus social cohesion).
In Paper 3, the highest marks were secured by candidates who explicitly linked data from different figures in the Resource Booklet to wider geographical concepts like neo-colonialism, brain drain, and climate feedback loops.
Question difficulty map
How candidates performed on each question in this series
No data available in official reports
Assessment objectives
Skill and AO weighting from official examiner commentary
Skill weighting
Shows the skill mix this paper tested most heavily.
Quantitative
Weight: 6100%Graphical and
Weight: 583%Logical
Weight: 467%Synoptic
Weight: 350%Evaluative Essay Writing Writing
Weight: 233%
Method marks watchlist
Where working, steps, or method marks were commonly lost
No data available in official reports
Recurring mistakes across years
Themes examiners flag in multiple recent sessions for this subject
No data available in official reports
Question choice intelligence
Mean scores and popularity for optional questions (HKDSE electives)
No data available in official reports
Level exemplars
What candidate scripts at each grade level looked like
No data available in official reports
Grade & admission context
How marks relate to grade thresholds and entry standards
Report type
Examiner report — national grade boundaries and question-level commentary
Level A*
Approx. 74% of maximum mark
Level A
Approx. 67% of maximum mark
Level B
Approx. 57% of maximum mark
Level C
Approx. 47% of maximum mark
Level D
Approx. 37% of maximum mark
Level E
Approx. 27% of maximum mark
Deep insights
What top candidates did
Techniques and approaches examiners rewarded in this series
No data available in official reports
Command word playbook
How to match each command word to the expected response style
Give reasons and link mechanism to outcome; each point needs a because/so chain.
Weigh arguments for and against with evidence; end with a supported judgement.
Show formula, substitution, and unit; method marks need visible working.
Match the expected response style for “Assess” questions.
Apply knowledge to an unfamiliar context; concise, practical points score best.
Break into parts and explain how each contributes to the whole question focus.
Time traps
Sections where candidates spent disproportionate time relative to marks
Min per mark: 2
Min per mark: 1.9
Min per mark: 1.3
Min per mark: 1.3
Min per mark: 1.3
Min per mark: 1.3
Syllabus traceability
Topics linked to questions and mark weighting in this session
Coastal Landscapes and Change
40 marks this session
Health, Human Rights and Intervention
38 marks this session
Regenerating Places
35 marks this session
MCQ trap analytics
Commonly chosen wrong options from examiner commentary
No data available in official reports
Topic heatmap across years
Mark concentration by topic and exam year for this subject
Mark intensity
Coastal Landscapes and Change
Health, Human Rights and Intervention
Regenerating Places
Difficulty trend
How session difficulty has shifted across recent years
Paper comparison
Marks and duration breakdown across papers in this session
Paper 1: Physical Geography:
Paper 2: Human Geography:
Paper 3: Synoptic Investigation:
Marks you can still earn
Where valid approaches outside the mark scheme may still gain credit
No data available in official reports
Practise what examiners flagged
Target weak topics from this report inside the Revui app
Coastal Landscapes and Change
40 marks this session
Practise in RevuiHealth, Human Rights and Intervention
38 marks this session
Practise in RevuiRegenerating Places
35 marks this session
Practise in RevuiSelf-diagnostic checklist
Key actions before you sit this paper — copy and tick off as you revise
- 1Message
High-scoring candidates distinguished themselves by demonstrating conceptual precision and robust mathematical processing.
- 2Message
In Paper 1, the physical processes behind landscape evolution (such as halosere succession in coastal spits or thermohaline circulation in ocean carbon regulation) required strict geographical terminology rather than general descriptions.
- 3Message
In Paper 2, top-tier marks were awarded to those who did not merely describe regeneration or migration but evaluated the success of strategies through well-defined criteria (e.g., economic productivity versus social cohesion).
- 4Message
In Paper 3, the highest marks were secured by candidates who explicitly linked data from different figures in the Resource Booklet to wider geographical concepts like neo-colonialism, brain drain, and climate feedback loops.
Teacher briefing pack
One-page session summary for tutors and classroom review
2022 2022
Geography
High-scoring candidates distinguished themselves by demonstrating conceptual precision and robust mathematical processing. In Paper 1, the physical processes behind landscape evolution (such as halosere succession in coastal spits or thermohaline circulation in ocean carbon regul
High-scoring candidates distinguished themselves by demonstrating conceptual precision and robust mathematical processing.
In Paper 1, the physical processes behind landscape evolution (such as halosere succession in coastal spits or thermohaline circulation in ocean carbon regulation) required strict geographical terminology rather than general descriptions.
In Paper 2, top-tier marks were awarded to those who did not merely describe regeneration or migration but evaluated the success of strategies through well-defined criteria (e.g., economic productivity versus social cohesion).
- Total marks
- 280
- Duration
- 405 min
- Session difficulty
- 4.0 / 5
Session analysis
High-scoring candidates distinguished themselves by demonstrating conceptual precision and robust mathematical processing. In Paper 1, the physical processes behind landscape evolution (such as halosere succession in coastal spits or thermohaline circulation in ocean carbon regulation) required strict geographical terminology rather than general descriptions. In Paper 2, top-tier marks were awarded to those who did not merely describe regeneration or migration but evaluated the success of strategies through well-defined criteria (e.g., economic productivity versus social cohesion). In Paper 3, the highest marks were secured by candidates who explicitly linked data from different figures in the Resource Booklet to wider geographical concepts like neo-colonialism, brain drain, and climate feedback loops.
Updated Jun 14, 2026
Paper breakdown
Paper 1: Physical Geography:
Paper 2: Human Geography:
Paper 3: Synoptic Investigation:
Top chapters
Exam structure insights
Marks by chapter
See where the marks were concentrated so revision time goes to the highest-value topics.
Mark accessibility
Estimate which marks were basic, mid-level, or high-difficulty.
54% within easy or medium reach
Command word frequency
Spot common command words so answers match the expected response style.
Question type mix
Compare the mark share of each paper section and question type.
18-24 mark Evaluate Essay
122·6·44%
Medium Tariff
(6-8 marks)
76·11·27%
12-mark Assess Essay
48·4·17%
Short Answer
(3-4 marks)
22·6·8%
Maths & Geographical Skills
12·7·4%
Study ROI
Bigger bubbles recur more often; higher bubbles carry more marks, helping you rank revision priorities.
Time vs marks
Compare marks with suggested time allocation to plan exam pacing.
Paper 1 Section A (…
0.80 m/minPaper 1 Section B (…
0.75 m/minPaper 1 Section C (…
0.80 m/minPaper 2 Section A (…
0.78 m/minPaper 2 Section B (…
0.76 m/minPaper 2 Section C (…
0.51 m/minPaper 3 Section A &…
0.53 m/minTotal marks
264
Total time
385 min
Avg pace
0.69
Next-year prediction
Topics worth watching next year, with the reason shown directly below each bar.
Superpowers
90%90%
Water Cycle & Water Insecurity
85%85%
Exam tips
Paper format
- Duration
- 2h 15min
- Total marks
- 70
- Weighting
- 30%
- Question types
- Explain, Calculation & Reliability Evaluation, Analytical Resource Evaluation, Evaluative Essay (Evaluate), Synoptic Decision-Making Essay
Analysis is paraphrased for study purposes. Always verify against the official examiner report and mark scheme.