PHYSICS-1PH0 · Pearson Edexcel GCSE (9–1)
PHYSICS-1PH0/11
(Foundation Tier)
Physics · 2023 · Variant 1
Relative difficulty
Analysis source: Pearson Edexcel
Analysis aligned to the official syllabus and assessment design.
2.3 / 5
200
210 min
Particle model, Radioactivity, and Conservation of energy
Cohort performance
Session statistics from official examination reports
Total marks
200
Duration
210 min
Session difficulty
2.3 / 5
Key examiner messages
Top priorities from the principal examiner before you revise
The Summer 2023 Pearson Edexcel GCSE Physics Foundation Tier papers presented a well-balanced and highly accessible assessment of the specification.
While designed to accommodate standard foundation-level skills with ample recall and single-step calculation questions, the exams cleverly integrated some higher-order cognitive demands towards the end of each paper.
This tier successfully tested student stamina and precision across all key chapters, culminating in an overall difficulty rating of 2.3 out of 5.
Question difficulty map
How candidates performed on each question in this series
No data available in official reports
Assessment objectives
Skill and AO weighting from official examiner commentary
Skill weighting
Shows the skill mix this paper tested most heavily.
Mathematical
Weight: 6100%Practical
Weight: 583%Skills Graphical
Weight: 467%Interpretation
Weight: 233%Descriptive &
Weight: 117%
Method marks watchlist
Where working, steps, or method marks were commonly lost
No data available in official reports
Recurring mistakes across years
Themes examiners flag in multiple recent sessions for this subject
No data available in official reports
Question choice intelligence
Mean scores and popularity for optional questions (HKDSE electives)
No data available in official reports
Level exemplars
What candidate scripts at each grade level looked like
No data available in official reports
Grade & admission context
How marks relate to grade thresholds and entry standards
Report type
Examiner report — national grade boundaries and question-level commentary
Level 9
Approx. 82% of maximum mark
Level 8
Approx. 74% of maximum mark
Level 7
Approx. 66% of maximum mark
Level 6
Approx. 56% of maximum mark
Level 5
Approx. 46% of maximum mark
Level 4
Approx. 37% of maximum mark
Level 3
Approx. 32% of maximum mark
Deep insights
What top candidates did
Techniques and approaches examiners rewarded in this series
No data available in official reports
Command word playbook
How to match each command word to the expected response style
Show formula, substitution, and unit; method marks need visible working.
State features in sequence or list observable properties — do not explain causes unless asked.
Give reasons and link mechanism to outcome; each point needs a because/so chain.
Match the expected response style for “Draw” questions.
Apply knowledge to an unfamiliar context; concise, practical points score best.
Match the expected response style for “State” questions.
Time traps
Sections where candidates spent disproportionate time relative to marks
Min per mark: 1
Min per mark: 1
Syllabus traceability
Topics linked to questions and mark weighting in this session
Radioactivity (Paper 1)
22 marks this session
Particle model
22 marks this session
Conservation of energy
22 marks this session
Motion and forces
20 marks this session
Electricity and circuits
20 marks this session
MCQ trap analytics
Commonly chosen wrong options from examiner commentary
No data available in official reports
Topic heatmap across years
Mark concentration by topic and exam year for this subject
Mark intensity
Electricity and circuits
Particle model
Motion and forces
Particle model (Paper 2)
Motion and forces (Paper 1)
Astronomy (Paper 1)
Radioactivity (Paper 1)
Conservation of energy
Paper comparison
Marks and duration breakdown across papers in this session
Paper 1F:
Paper 2F:
Marks you can still earn
Where valid approaches outside the mark scheme may still gain credit
No data available in official reports
Practise what examiners flagged
Target weak topics from this report inside the Revui app
Radioactivity (Paper 1)
22 marks this session
Practise in RevuiParticle model
22 marks this session
Practise in RevuiConservation of energy
22 marks this session
Practise in RevuiMotion and forces
20 marks this session
Practise in RevuiElectricity and circuits
20 marks this session
Practise in RevuiSelf-diagnostic checklist
Key actions before you sit this paper — copy and tick off as you revise
- 1Message
The Summer 2023 Pearson Edexcel GCSE Physics Foundation Tier papers presented a well-balanced and highly accessible assessment of the specification.
- 2Message
While designed to accommodate standard foundation-level skills with ample recall and single-step calculation questions, the exams cleverly integrated some higher-order cognitive demands towards the end of each paper.
- 3Message
This tier successfully tested student stamina and precision across all key chapters, culminating in an overall difficulty rating of 2.3 out of 5.
Teacher briefing pack
One-page session summary for tutors and classroom review
2023 2023
Physics
The Summer 2023 Pearson Edexcel GCSE Physics Foundation Tier papers presented a well-balanced and highly accessible assessment of the specification. While designed to accommodate standard foundation-level skills with ample recall and single-step calculation questions, the exams c
The Summer 2023 Pearson Edexcel GCSE Physics Foundation Tier papers presented a well-balanced and highly accessible assessment of the specification.
While designed to accommodate standard foundation-level skills with ample recall and single-step calculation questions, the exams cleverly integrated some higher-order cognitive demands towards the end of each paper.
This tier successfully tested student stamina and precision across all key chapters, culminating in an overall difficulty rating of 2.3 out of 5.
- Total marks
- 200
- Duration
- 210 min
- Session difficulty
- 2.3 / 5
Session analysis
The Summer 2023 Pearson Edexcel GCSE Physics Foundation Tier papers presented a well-balanced and highly accessible assessment of the specification. While designed to accommodate standard foundation-level skills with ample recall and single-step calculation questions, the exams cleverly integrated some higher-order cognitive demands towards the end of each paper. This tier successfully tested student stamina and precision across all key chapters, culminating in an overall difficulty rating of 2.3 out of 5.
Updated Jun 14, 2026
Paper breakdown
Paper 1F:
Paper 2F:
Top chapters
Exam structure insights
Marks by chapter
See where the marks were concentrated so revision time goes to the highest-value topics.
Mark accessibility
Estimate which marks were basic, mid-level, or high-difficulty.
80% within easy or medium reach
Command word frequency
Spot common command words so answers match the expected response style.
Question type mix
Compare the mark share of each paper section and question type.
calculation
61·24·31%
shortAnswer
56·28·28%
graphAndPractical
34·12·17%
extendedWritingAsterisk
24·4·12%
multipleChoice
16·16·8%
matching
9·3·5%
Study ROI
Bigger bubbles recur more often; higher bubbles carry more marks, helping you rank revision priorities.
Difficulty trend
Compare difficulty across recent years.
Time vs marks
Compare marks with suggested time allocation to plan exam pacing.
Paper 1 (Questions
0.98 m/minPaper 2 (Questions
0.98 m/minTotal marks
88
Total time
90 min
Avg pace
0.98
Cumulative marks ladder
The line is your running mark total question by question; dashed lines are the estimated grade cut-offs. See which question the line crosses your target grade at, so you know how far you must answer cleanly and which questions decide a band.
Next-year prediction
Topics worth watching next year, with the reason shown directly below each bar.
Electricity and circuits
90%90%
Electromagnetic induction
85%85%
Astronomy
80%80%
Summer 2023 Physics (1PH0) Foundation Tier Analysis
The Summer 2023 Pearson Edexcel GCSE Physics Foundation Tier papers presented a well-balanced and highly accessible assessment of the specification. While designed to accommodate standard foundation-level skills with ample recall and single-step calculation questions, the exams cleverly integrated some higher-order cognitive demands towards the end of each paper. This tier successfully tested student stamina and precision across all key chapters, culminating in an overall difficulty rating of 2.3 out of 5.
Exam tips
Paper format
- Duration
- 1h 45min
- Total marks
- 100
- Weighting
- 50%
- Question types
- Multiple Choice, Short Answer / Labeling, Structured Calculations, Extended Writing (6-Mark)
Analysis is paraphrased for study purposes. Always verify against the official examiner report and mark scheme.