Back to subject papers

MATHEMATICS-YMA01 · Pearson Edexcel International A Level

MATHEMATICS-YMA01/11

Paper 1

Mathematics · Winter 2025 · Variant 1

Relative difficulty

Demanding · 3.5/5

Analysis source: Pearson Edexcel

Analysis aligned to the official syllabus and assessment design.

Relative difficulty

3.5 / 5

Total marks

450

Duration

540 min

Most tested topic

Algebra and functions (Unit P1)

Cohort performance

Session statistics from official examination reports

Total marks

450

Duration

540 min

Session difficulty

3.5 / 5

Key examiner messages

Top priorities from the principal examiner before you revise

1

The January 2025 examination series for the International Advanced Level (IAL) Mathematics Cash-in suite presented a balanced yet mathematically rigorous set of papers.

2

Spanning Pure Mathematics (P1–P4), Mechanics (M1), and Statistics (S1), the assessments were designed to thoroughly test algebraic fluency, geometric intuition, and real-world mathematical modelling.

3

With a difficulty rating of 3.5 out of 5, the series proved highly accessible in its initial questions but featured challenging differentiators towards the latter halves of each paper.

Question difficulty map

How candidates performed on each question in this series

No data available in official reports

Assessment objectives

Skill and AO weighting from official examiner commentary

Algebraic10
Fluency9
Calculus Application8
Mechanical Modelling6
Statistical Interpretation4
Geometric Reasoning2

Skill weighting

Shows the skill mix this paper tested most heavily.

AlgebraicAlgebraicFluencyFluencyCalculus ApplicationCalculusApplicationMechanical ModellingMechanicalModellingStatistical InterpretationStatisticalInterpretationGeometric ReasoningGeometricReasoning
SkillWeightShare
  • Algebraic

    Weight: 10100%
  • Fluency

    Weight: 990%
  • Calculus Application

    Weight: 880%
  • Mechanical Modelling

    Weight: 660%
  • Statistical Interpretation

    Weight: 440%
  • Geometric Reasoning

    Weight: 220%

Method marks watchlist

Where working, steps, or method marks were commonly lost

No data available in official reports

Recurring mistakes across years

Themes examiners flag in multiple recent sessions for this subject

No data available in official reports

Question choice intelligence

Mean scores and popularity for optional questions (HKDSE electives)

No data available in official reports

Level exemplars

What candidate scripts at each grade level looked like

No data available in official reports

Grade & admission context

How marks relate to grade thresholds and entry standards

Report type

Examiner report — national grade boundaries and question-level commentary

Level A*

Approx. 90% of maximum mark

Level A

Approx. 80% of maximum mark

Level B

Approx. 70% of maximum mark

Level C

Approx. 60% of maximum mark

Level D

Approx. 50% of maximum mark

Level E

Approx. 40% of maximum mark

Deep insights

What top candidates did

Techniques and approaches examiners rewarded in this series

No data available in official reports

Command word playbook

How to match each command word to the expected response style

FindFrequency: 42

Match the expected response style for “Find” questions.

ShowFrequency: 22

Match the expected response style for “Show” questions.

SketchFrequency: 6

Match the expected response style for “Sketch” questions.

ExplainFrequency: 5

Give reasons and link mechanism to outcome; each point needs a because/so chain.

StateFrequency: 14

Match the expected response style for “State” questions.

Time traps

Sections where candidates spent disproportionate time relative to marks

Pure Mathematics P140m / 20 marks

Min per mark: 2

Syllabus traceability

Topics linked to questions and mark weighting in this session

Algebra and functions (Unit P1)

35 marks this session

Integration (Unit P4)

31 marks this session

Dynamics of a particle moving in a straight line or plane (Unit M1)

27 marks this session

Differentiation (Unit P3)

23 marks this session

Representation and summary of data (Unit S1)

20 marks this session

MCQ trap analytics

Commonly chosen wrong options from examiner commentary

No data available in official reports

Topic heatmap across years

Mark concentration by topic and exam year for this subject

Mark intensity

LowHigh
Topic
2024
2025
2026
Σ

Linear programming

22
22
44

Critical path analysis

20
19
39

Algebra and functions (P1)

39
39

Algebra and functions (Unit P1)

35
35

Integration (Unit P4)

31
31

Algorithms on graphs II

14
15
29

Dynamics of a particle moving in a straight line or plane (Unit M1)

27
27

Dynamics of a particle moving in a straight line or plane (M1)

26
26

Paper comparison

Marks and duration breakdown across papers in this session

Pure Mathematics P1 (WMA11): Pure Mathematics P2 (WMA12): Pure Mathematics P3 (WMA13): Pure Mathematics P4 (WMA14): Mechanics M1 (WME01): Statistics S1 (WST01):

75 marks90 min

Marks you can still earn

Where valid approaches outside the mark scheme may still gain credit

No data available in official reports

Practise what examiners flagged

Target weak topics from this report inside the Revui app

Self-diagnostic checklist

Key actions before you sit this paper — copy and tick off as you revise

  • 1Message

    The January 2025 examination series for the International Advanced Level (IAL) Mathematics Cash-in suite presented a balanced yet mathematically rigorous set of papers.

  • 2Message

    Spanning Pure Mathematics (P1–P4), Mechanics (M1), and Statistics (S1), the assessments were designed to thoroughly test algebraic fluency, geometric intuition, and real-world mathematical modelling.

  • 3Message

    With a difficulty rating of 3.5 out of 5, the series proved highly accessible in its initial questions but featured challenging differentiators towards the latter halves of each paper.

Teacher briefing pack

One-page session summary for tutors and classroom review

Winter 2025 2025

Mathematics

The January 2025 examination series for the International Advanced Level (IAL) Mathematics Cash-in suite presented a balanced yet mathematically rigorous set of papers. Spanning Pure Mathematics (P1–P4), Mechanics (M1), and Statistics (S1), the assessments were designed to thorou

  • The January 2025 examination series for the International Advanced Level (IAL) Mathematics Cash-in suite presented a balanced yet mathematically rigorous set of papers.

  • Spanning Pure Mathematics (P1–P4), Mechanics (M1), and Statistics (S1), the assessments were designed to thoroughly test algebraic fluency, geometric intuition, and real-world mathematical modelling.

  • With a difficulty rating of 3.5 out of 5, the series proved highly accessible in its initial questions but featured challenging differentiators towards the latter halves of each paper.

Total marks
450
Duration
540 min
Session difficulty
3.5 / 5

Session analysis

The January 2025 examination series for the International Advanced Level (IAL) Mathematics Cash-in suite presented a balanced yet mathematically rigorous set of papers. Spanning Pure Mathematics (P1–P4), Mechanics (M1), and Statistics (S1), the assessments were designed to thoroughly test algebraic fluency, geometric intuition, and real-world mathematical modelling. With a difficulty rating of 3.5 out of 5, the series proved highly accessible in its initial questions but featured challenging differentiators towards the latter halves of each paper.

Updated Jun 12, 2026

Paper breakdown

Pure Mathematics P1 (WMA11): Pure Mathematics P2 (WMA12): Pure Mathematics P3 (WMA13): Pure Mathematics P4 (WMA14): Mechanics M1 (WME01): Statistics S1 (WST01):

75 marks90 min

Top chapters

Algebra and functions (Unit P1)35 marks
Integration (Unit P4)31 marks
Dynamics of a particle moving in a straight line or plane (Unit M1)27 marks
Differentiation (Unit P3)23 marks
Representation and summary of data (Unit S1)20 marks

Exam structure insights

Marks by chapter

See where the marks were concentrated so revision time goes to the highest-value topics.

Integration (Unit P1)14 marks
Coordinate geometry in the (x,5 marks
Algebra and functions (Unit P1)35 marks
Differentiation (Unit P1)8 marks
Trigonometry (Unit P1)13 marks
Sequences and series (Unit P2)10 marks
Algebra and functions (Unit P2)14 marks
Differentiation (Unit P2)10 marks

Mark accessibility

Estimate which marks were basic, mid-level, or high-difficulty.

80% within easy or medium reach

160
200
90
Easy: 160 marksMedium: 200 marksHard: 90 marks

Command word frequency

Spot common command words so answers match the expected response style.

Find42 times
Show22 times
Sketch6 times
Explain5 times
State14 times

Question type mix

Compare the mark share of each paper section and question type.

450Marks
  • Long Structured

    250·18·56%

  • Medium Structured

    150·22·33%

  • Short Answer

    50·20·11%

Study ROI

Bigger bubbles recur more often; higher bubbles carry more marks, helping you rank revision priorities.

DifficultyRecurrence %Algebra and functi…Integration (Unit …Dynamics of a part…Representation and…Differentiation (U…

Difficulty trend

Compare difficulty across recent years.

3.520233.420243.52025

Time vs marks

Compare marks with suggested time allocation to plan exam pacing.

MarksMinutesMarks / min

Pure Mathematics P1

0.50 m/min
20
40

Total marks

20

Total time

40 min

Avg pace

0.50

Next-year prediction

Topics worth watching next year, with the reason shown directly below each bar.

Proof by Induction (Unit P4)

85%

85%

Variable Acceleration with Calculus (Unit M1)

80%

80%

Bayes' Theorem / Conditional Probability (Unit S1)

75%

75%

Paper analysis

The January 2025 examination series for the International Advanced Level (IAL) Mathematics Cash-in suite presented a balanced yet mathematically rigorous set of papers. Spanning Pure Mathematics (P1–P4), Mechanics (M1), and Statistics (S1), the assessments were designed to thoroughly test algebraic fluency, geometric intuition, and real-world mathematical modelling. With a difficulty rating of 3.5 out of 5, the series proved highly accessible in its initial questions but featured challenging differentiators towards the latter halves of each paper.

Analysis is paraphrased for study purposes. Always verify against the official examiner report and mark scheme.

MATHEMATICS-YMA01/11 — Pearson Edexcel International A Level Mathematics (Winter 2025) | Revui